For government
With convenient locations and the strong track record of the return-to-retail model, legislators are more likely to achieve positive community response and higher return rates. A significant improvement in recycling can be achieved quickly, such as Lithuania seeing beverage container return rates rise from 34% to 92% within just two years of launching its return-to-retail DRS – an environmental and economic success that’s also reflected as a policy success.
With supermarkets located close to residential areas, the infrastructure for this model is already in place, so a return-to-retail approach removes the need to build or outfit new recycling depots. As such, the deposit return systems can launch more cost-effectively and faster – a key consideration in short delivery timeframes. Supermarket chains typically have networks across whole markets, including remote communities, ensuring recycling points are available for everyone. Supermarkets already accommodate truck access, for dedicated pick-up of returned containers or backhauling to their central warehouse. This means a more organized, efficient collection structure, lower costs and fewer trucks on roads.
Finally, return-to-retail collection often avoids extra costs. Non-retail redemption operators tend to incur higher handling fees, require funding for site maintenance, and charge commercial rates for services like bin changing and refunds.